1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central.

The problem may be the perverse incentive systems in scientific publishing. As long as authors are rewarded for publishing many articles and editors are rewarded for publishing them quickly, new means of gaming the traditional publication models will be invented quicker than new control measures can be put in place.. Charlotte J. Haug, M.D., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher also owned by Springer, retracted 43 content articles for the same reason. How is it possible to fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plants, had set up a straightforward treatment. He gave journals recommendations for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, providing them with e-mail and brands addresses. But these addresses were ones he created, therefore the requests to examine went directly to him or his colleagues.On July 13 The advertisement opens with a video clip of the President speaking, 2010 about the National AIDS Strategy. Obama states: ‘We’re right here because we believe in an America where those coping with HIV/AIDS are not viewed with suspicion but treated with respect – where they’re given the medications and healthcare.’ ‘Though the President provides spoken eloquently about Helps issues at certain moments, his words have been quite, but empty. His inspiring speeches do nothing at all to help the 10 nearly,000 Americans living with HIV/AIDS waiting for lifesaving medications,’ said Michael Weinstein, President of Helps Healthcare Foundation.